As the recession continues to bite, more and more businesses are finding it difficult to continue trading. However, very often these difficulties are not because customers have stopped buying completely. Rather, they are buying in reduced volumes and asking for lower prices.

In these circumstances many businesses could continue to trade if they did not have the burden of historic debts. Since the Enterprise Act of 1984, it has been possible to request relief from corporate creditors using a Company Voluntary Arrangement or CVA. With the agreement of creditors, a Company Voluntary Arrangement allows a portion of corporate debt to be repaid at a manageable rate over a set period of time, the remaining debt being written off. However, this procedure has long been criticised by both creditors and insolvency professionals alike due to the high percentage of early failures. The main argument against the CVA is that the fundamental structure of the business and its management team do not change. Therefore even with the burden of historic debt lifted the reasons for past failure are likely to repeat themselves.

Given the criticism levied against a Company Voluntary Arrangement, the process of Phoenixing (also known as Pre-Pack sale in liquidation or administration) has become more widely considered as a practical way of saving a business. Simply put, the act of Phoenixing is where a new company is formed which then buys the assets, contracts and goodwill of the failing business for a reasonable market rate. The legacy debt is left within the old business which is then liquidated thus allowing the new Phoenix business to trade on, debt free.

From the beginning of 2009, much comment has been made about the Phoenix process in the media. Very often this has quite negative about the process because of the fact that creditors are left with unpaid debts which may in turn lead them to suffer their own financial difficulties. However, what has been largely overlooked in these published arguments is the reason for the failing company is not the Phoenix process. The reason for the failure was the company's inability to continue to trade. In these circumstances, liquidation was extremely likely if not inevitablewhether or not a Phoenix process took place. As such creditors would always have been out of pocket.

Another criticism of Phoenixing is that creditors are not afforded the right to reject the new company's proposal to purchase the business assets from the failing company. However, it is widely recognised that to go through an open process of sale due to failure (often using administration) often destroys many of a company's valuable assets such as good will and contractual obligations. In addition, discussing matters with creditors before a potential sale of assets opens the possibility of the creditor taking unilateral recovery action which may well be detrimental. As such, a Pre Packaged sale will actually deliver the best possible return to creditors. From November 2008 Creditors have been afforded better protection with the Insolvency Service publishing guidelines which require insolvency practitioners to ensure full market value is paid for the assets and provide a report to creditors of why this action is more beneficial to them.

The arguments for the Phoenix process are compelling.
- The new business is not saddled with the historic debt
- There is no obligation for debt repayment
- It allows the introduction of new procedures and ways of working
- Inappropriate location or lease agreements are not retained giveing every opportunity for sucess
- Far better chance of jobs being saved compared with Liquidation

Despite the advantages this will obviously not be the correct solution for all businesses in financial trouble. However for businesses at risk of failure in these challenging economic circumstances Phoenixing must certainly be given serious consideration.